Bangladesh's former prime minister has been sentenced to death for human rights violations due to her crackdown on youth demonstrations which caused her ousting.
Sheikh Hasina was found guilty of allowing lethal force to be used against activists, among whom around 1,400 people were killed during the disturbances during 2024.
The trial proceeded without her presence by the International Crimes Court in Bangladesh, having been exiled in India following her ouster in July 2024.
The prosecution alleged of being the mastermind of multiple fatalities during the protests. The former leader rejected all charges, calling the trial as "prejudiced and driven by politics".
This judgment represents a pivotal moment for Bangladesh, as the protests unleashed anger over years of repression. Relatives of the deceased and harmed had demanded severe punishments.
Reacting to the verdict in a detailed document, the former leader stated the execution sentence was the interim government's way of "nullifying [her party] the Awami League" as a electoral entity and that she was satisfied of her administration's performance on individual freedoms.
"I am not afraid to confront those accusing me in a just legal forum where the proof can be evaluated and examined justly."
The capital, Dhaka, where the legal proceedings occurred, was under enhanced protection ahead of the ruling on Monday, with numerous opponents of Hasina staging a rally and celebrating as the sentence was declared.
The city has seen a notable rise in turmoil, with dozens of bombs exploded and public transport vehicles burned in the days leading up to the verdict.
At least one bomb explosion was recorded in Dhaka on Monday morning, with no casualties reported, area law enforcement officer the authorities' representative informed media outlets.
The youth-driven revolt last year commenced through demands to abolish public sector reservation policies but morphed into a more extensive dissent initiative.
UN human rights investigators stated in a document in February that the nearly 1,400 casualties could constitute "human rights atrocities".
The report documented the gunfire from minimal distance of certain demonstrators, the intentional injuring of further participants, arbitrary arrests and torture.
Disclosed sound files of a telephone conversation involving Hasina confirmed by media examinations earlier this year implied she had approved the use of "fatal instruments" in July 2024. The sound file was broadcast in court during the trial.
Ahead of the verdict, family members of those killed during the protests told press outlets they wanted Hasina to be punished severely.
One relative, whose sibling was killed in July 2024, said he wanted "exemplary punishment" for her and co-accused who have "committed acts of vengeance and exploited their positions".
Lucky Akther, whose husband was killed near Dhaka in August 2024, said she wanted the former leader's punishment to be "executed before the election".
"Exclusively thereafter the relatives of the deceased [in the protests] will achieve closure in their minds."
Since Hasina's ousting, an interim government under the guidance of economic expert Muhammad Yunus has assumed control. A general election is planned for February 2026.
However, the her former political organization, Hasina's political party, was banned by Bangladesh's interim government in May.
She alerted in the previous month that if the party's candidates were banned from standing in the imminent electoral process, countless would abstain the vote.
The verdict now poses a international dilemma for India and Bangladesh. Authorities have sought her return but to date India has shown no willingness to agree.
The legal representative assigned to her the defense lawyer said he was "unhappy and desiring the outcome had varied".
"I even cannot appeal because my defendants are not present; for that reason I am sad," he stated further.
The previous week, Hasina's lawyers said they had submitted an immediate petition to the UN highlighting serious fair trial and judicial process problems at the ICT.
The former leader faced trial alongside her ex-interior minister and security forces head.
While the sentence grants partial finality to relatives of the deceased in the protests, it may not significantly ease the country's political divisions.
"The resentment towards Sheikh Hasina and the Awami League has not decreased," a human rights advocate from the capital informed press agencies. "The leader and her faction has said sorry or displayed repentance for the killings of hundreds of people."
The activist stated "This complicates matters for the party to be accepted by a majority of people in this state."
The campaigner further stated that the sentence was not finality for the relatives of those fatally and non-fatally harmed.
"We work with numerous persons who suffered permanent amputations, they are amputees now, as a result of the harsh measures. They are incapable of excusing her."
David Bergman, a journalist and a long-time Bangladesh watcher, said the "inherent character of the guilty verdict could make it increasingly challenging" for the political faction to become a standard element of the nation's political landscape again.
This could alter if "a form of contrition emerges and a separation from Sheikh Hasina and the old leadership," he said.
A seasoned financial analyst with over a decade of experience in wealth management and investment consulting, passionate about empowering others.